Macbeth has been performed by many different groups and companies over the years because it is perhaps one of the most powerful political statements in Western drama and perhaps one of Shakespeare's best scripts. While the PBS and RSC versions of the play have many differences, they are still brilliant interpretations of the play. Through excellent acting, sets and sound effects, they transport us into the play, giving the characters the life and raw emotions that are essential to theatre. While both plays differ in many ways, they are still incredibly similar in that they keep Macbeth as the main character, have a hierarchy, and most importantly, keep the plot the same as the original script as a solemn tribute to Shakespeare. We say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The 2010 variant of Macbeth is set in an alternate history, ready for battle in Scotland. The day and age could be anywhere from the 1940s to the 1950s. Numerous quick clips of howitzers and other large weapons of war appear. Many soldiers can be seen parading in huge central squares, as in scenes from Nazi Germany or Stalinist Russia. This version of the play also maintains the discourse of a traditional Shakespearean play. For this reason, the play/film has a very long duration. This film was formulated to give a play set in Shakespeare's time a modernist approach and point of view. The blending of past and present in this film was done in an interesting way. Even in the early couple scenes the characters' language and actions portray Shakespeare at odds with how they would have spoken or acted in those times. Some of the effects throughout the film added suspense, effect and drama to the work, but sometimes also detracted from the language because it was distracting. Another change in the work that differs from the original version would be how the three witches, instead of being witches, are instead depicted as evil nurses. As for the RSC version of the play, only 100 people saw this performance to begin with. There was a limited amount of money spent on props, costumes and sets. Due to lack of funds for costumes, props, etc. there was more money and time to focus on the actors. There was a very select cast and many of them played multiple roles due to the short cast list. The weapons used during this performance dated back to Shakespeare's time, proving that the play was performed in Shakespeare's time. The background of the set and the scenography is dark, gloomy and smoky with relative spotlights focused on the actors, rigorously drawing the gaze directly on them. The characters themselves are incredibly dramatic, with their booming voices and their acting so varied and artistic that they draw the audience into the show. The cast worked very well together, practically in a circle, each taking advantage of the brilliance of their fellow actor and using it to appear more magnanimous and incredible. In both plays, fear was present in the audience during certain scenes because they were so dramatic and dramatic. intense that it felt like we were there. There was also a sense of constraint during the performances. This made it seem like the actors were constantly holding raw emotions inside; this was done masterfully because, in Macbeth, not everything could always be said due to the circumstances, so the constraint adequately portrayed the feeling of holding back that the actual characters in the play.