In the book Freakonomics, written by financial expert Steven D. Levitt and journalist Stephen J. Dubner, the authors experimented with various pieces of current life to demonstrate how economics clarifies why people act in certain ways just as explicit outcomes occur. They examine different pieces of society and see them with interchangeable prospects. Through the use of unambiguous data and the essential elements of economics, the dark insights and various sections of the book show the relationship between human instinct and economics. The authors' perspective on the economy, educational framework, and human instinct really captured my attention and broadened my vision. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Levitt describes the book as a push to peel back the outer layer of present life and see what's going on beneath it. He accomplished this by taking double opportunities that are unrelated and combining them. From looking at the instructors and sumo wrestlers, to the curiosity about why crack dealers still live with their mothers. Levitt and Dubner actually put a twist on the standard perspective by studying it through different perspectives. From the very beginning of the book, the authors had a chance to grab my attention and awaken my enthusiasm for the promises they arranged to reveal. The way the authors analyzed crimes and the association between authorized fetal removal and the impact it has on crime rates influenced me positively. Unlike most books, this book has no central idea; actually in the opening segment Levitt made it clear as a plan. The main concern was to get people to challenge ideas and thoughts that are normally accepted as valid. One of the essential aspects of this book is that powers of persuasion are the institution of life today, and that the examination of economics is the examination of incentives: how people get what they want or need, especially when different people need or want something. basically the same. Freakonomics opened my psyche and my eyes to how motivating forces, motivations, and risks play a noteworthy role in the ordinary events of our society today. All in all, the examinations of freakonomics, perhaps like no other quantitatively organized book, have achieved the differentiation between looking at the world from the point of view of a moralist and the point of view of the world from the analyst. In any case, if morality addresses how an individual may need the world to function, economics addresses how it actually works. References Levitt, S.D. and Dubner, S.J. (2009) Freakonomics. New York: HarperCollins