In Jules Howard's article “The 'Grieving' Mother Orca?' Projecting emotions onto animals is a sad mistake,” the author explains this vision of the concept of animals with emotions. He begins by explaining recent documentation of a mother orca mourning her dead calf and questions the validity of the situation, confused whether animals are truly bearers of emotions. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Howard uses the article to proudly promote his novel and his study in the field of animal complaints. It lists evidence of animal complaints such as police dogs crying for their officers and even horses burying kennels in hay. In Howard's eyes, this form of ritual burial and mourning among animals is not the animal equivalent of a funeral. Despite the differences between humans and unicellular prokaryotes, there is a common similarity in the basic need to reproduce and breathe, both aerobic and anaerobic. Humans share many similarities with orcas, such as having different languages ​​and cultures and simply being the largest of mammals. Are all these similarities and the idea that these whales have emotions not even considered? This story may be of interest to non-scientists as it is heavily based on public opinion. The idea of ​​animals' emotions is often underestimated and not considered as important compared to their genetic makeup. Animal genetics are of interest to scientists as further animal research could potentially help humans in the future. Howard's piece completely opposes movements protesting animal abuse and exploitation as these movements highlight the fact that animals have feelings and feel pain like humans do. The author continually lists reasons against his argument and concludes the article by stating that all animals should be respected. Decisions should be based on evidence. Data should be collected and analyzed to support a point. Howard's indecisive statements and insufficient evidence for his thesis may appeal to non-scientists as the narrative interests many. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay The article is interesting in the sense that it is a very explicit point of view that many people may be afraid to address due to its controversy. Our canine counterparts are labeled “man's best friend,” and this emotional attachment that humans have developed over the years with animals can make Howard's point difficult to understand. Regardless, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, however Howard's article could apparently be more successful in the debate. org as The Guardian should, as it is more accessible to non-scientists.