Scientific questions are often expected to produce only one result that is considered definitive and correct. However, these questions can produce many different answers and theories depending on the approach or thinking method used to reach a conclusion. These different answers can seriously hinder the progress of science and knowledge by creating discrepancies between physicists. Therefore, especially regarding universal laws, certain methods of thinking are preferred to answer these questions with certainty and eliminate discrepancies. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay. These methods are reliable for defending universal laws accepted as facts. In Richard Feynman's lecture series on The Character of Physical Law, Feynman defends the bias in favor of mathematics in physics because it is the only method of thinking to fully understand the beauty of the world. Feynman argues that mathematics is the most useful tool in physical laws. Despite the universality of physical laws, mathematics is still needed to express and represent them. “The strange thing about physics is that we still need mathematics for the fundamental laws” (36). Mathematical equations are the only expressions that can accurately show the laws. Mathematics is used as quantitative reasoning to explain the physical laws of world phenomena. Scientific questions are often expected to produce only one result that is considered definitive and correct. However, these questions can produce many different answers and theories depending on the approach or thinking method used to reach a conclusion. These different answers can seriously hinder the progress of science and knowledge by creating discrepancies between physicists. Therefore, especially regarding universal laws, certain thinking methods are preferred to answer these questions with certainty to eliminate the discrepancy. The defense of universal laws accepted as facts relies on these methods. In Richard Feynman's lecture series on The Character of Physical Law, Feynman defends the bias in favor of mathematics in physics because it is the only method of thinking to fully understand the beauty of the world. Feynman advocates mathematics as the most useful tool in physical laws. Despite the universality of physical laws, mathematics is still needed to express and represent them. “The strange thing about physics is that we still need mathematics for the fundamental laws” (36). Mathematical equations are the only expressions that can accurately show the laws. Mathematics is used as quantitative reasoning to explain the physical laws of the world's phenomena. Scientific questions are often expected to produce only one result that is considered definitive and correct. However, these questions can produce many different answers and theories depending on the approach or thinking method used to reach a conclusion. These different answers can seriously hinder the progress of science and knowledge by creating discrepancies between physicists. Therefore, especially regarding universal laws, certain methods of thinking are preferred to answer these questions with certainty and eliminate discrepancies. The defense of universal laws accepted as facts relies on these methods. In Richard Feynman's lecture series on The Character of Physical Law, Feynman defends the bias in favor of mathematics in physics because it is the only method of thinking to fully understand the beauty of the world. Feynman advocates mathematics as the most tool.