Index IntroductionTreaty of VersaillesLeague of NationspacificationConclusionIntroductionMany argue that the Second World War occurred due to various reasons, such as economic, political and military . The individual interpretations of historians who wrote about their encounters during or after the war, often using various evidence, also cover a range of causes. Looking at the arguments made by historians based on their different perspectives leads to a historical debate about what the root cause was. This essay evaluates three factors that should be considered the main causes of World War II: the Treaty of Versailles, the League of Nations, and Appeasement. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayTreaty of VersaillesThe Treaty of Versailles was harsh on the Germans because even though they played a role in the war and supposedly started the war, the treaty they stated that in War Guilt Clause 231 they must take all the blame that infuriated them. George Clemenceau was determined to take revenge. He wanted Germany to pay huge reparations to the victorious countries and wanted the overseas colonies taken away. Woodrow Wilson wanted peace, no reparations, retention of key industrial areas, and only limited disarmament to keep Germany safe. David Lloyd George believed that the Germans should take the blame for starting the war, but any reparations they would be forced to pay would be moderate. These three combined made a harsh treaty that the Germans did not like. From the German point of view this was an act of betrayal. Germany was frustrated because it thought the Treaty would be based primarily on Wilson's 14 Points, such as self-determination for countries, freedom of the seas to allow all countries to trade, and the creation of a world parliament known as the League of Nations and when it's not that they were very angry with France and Great Britain. If the Treaty had been less harsh, Germany would not have been bothered by the 6.6 billion in reparations or the War Guilt Clause 231, according to which they would have to take all the blame for the war. All countries could have learned to coexist with each other and focus on their own country's problems, such as economic and social ones. They could have worked together harmoniously to achieve world peace, for example, instead of putting Germany in a corner because the Big Three had their own individual revenge plans against Germany. League of Nations It could also be argued that the League of Nations played an important role in causing World War II. For example, in the Manchurian crisis of 1933, the League officially condemned Japan's actions and did not use military force or economic sanctions because they were afraid of Japan invading their colonies in the Far East. The League was more concerned about their own well-being than getting involved in a war on the League's behalf. This disappointed them as it shows that they were not strong enough to resist countries breaking their rules. This was ignored by the Japanese who quickly abandoned the League and invaded another part of China called Jehol. This shows why the League of Nations contributed to the outbreak of World War II because the key countries were not members of the League like Germany, the United States and Russia, so they were not taken as seriously by foreign countries. For example, the Hoare-Laval Pact was significant because it showed us that Britain and.