Jean Baudrillard suspected that the Gulf War should not be seen as a war. Or perhaps, despite having its material characteristics, it was once both real and simulated. Baudrillard's logic is that the expression "war" was used to validate a performance of some kind, and it is important to apply his logic to the War on Terror. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay There are numerous critics of Baudrillard's "The Gulf War Didn't Take Place" who regularly take note of the provocative title. Clearly a war has occurred and the title is not intended to actually be taken. Baudrillard is subverting the logic of the Gulf War through black humor and parody, with specific thought to the thesis that intelligent warfare was pursued through mechanically and technologically accurate missile attacks and bombing. Baudrillard saw a total break in the truth of the thesis as it was actually occurring and in the narrative intensity of its media presence. Baudrillard's examination remains convenient. The actual battle was an intangible part of the campaign, as shown, that is, the means by which broadcasts and authentic historical documentation talked about what was happening. The prominent Gulf War hypothesis was hidden in illusion, not only while it was going through the control of extraordinary live broadcasts, but also after the conflict by timely setting the tone for records. For example, cable news documentaries advertising the U.S. Army Cavalry were released very quickly. Using idealized systems in Panama, the Falkland Islands and Grenada, the war was approached in entirely representative terms. The intention was to restore the framework of the US military machine, especially at the local level. He took into account what Baudrillard calls "the ideal likeness of triumph," that is, that which would shelter Americans from what leading President Bush called "the disorder of Vietnam." Baudrillard interpreted it as a declaration of universal free enterprise. Marx wrote that as private enterprise develops, "everything strong melts into air," and Baudrillard saw this reflected in Desert Storm, just as if it were a morality tale for the ruinous tendency of free enterprise. The French scholar clarified that the war had proved theoretical, electronic and enlightening, in a way parallel to the idea of ​​backward capital. The Gulf War was about how individuals got involved in the war, not how it was irrational. destinations, or that numerous Allied officers never actually noticed the Iraqis they were apparently fighting. Instead of being a negative experience between two groups, the Gulf War was said to be a war because the term "war" offered authenticity to a war spectacle. That exhibition ended up setting the tone for American territorial dominance. It also trained Saddam Hussein in a way that could take into account the “taming of stubborn powers” ​​in the coming decades, both in terms of the risk of interstate savagery and in useful stories that debilitated conflicting options with growing neoliberal demand led by the United States. Saddam was presented to audiences around the world as something disgusting, to be devastated through military activity. It was a depiction that depended on orientalist symbolism of a neurotic fool who resisted human progress.