Topic > Comparing and contrasting analysis of maximalist and minimalist democracy

Index IntroductionWhat is democracy?The similarities between minimalist and maximalist democraciesThe differences between minimalist and maximalist democraciesConclusionReferencesIntroductionDemocracy is a multifaceted concept with various interpretations and implementations around the world. Two important approaches to democracy are maximalist and minimalist democracy. Although both systems aim to uphold democratic principles, they differ in the degree of inclusiveness and government intervention. This essay provides an in-depth comparative analysis of maximalist and minimalist democracy, exploring their characteristics, advantages, disadvantages and their relevance in the contemporary political landscape. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay What is democracy? Democracy, as eloquently defined by former American President Abraham Lincoln, is a government that operates "of the people, by the people, and for the people." Essentially, democracy means a system of governance in which all members of a state or political system play an active role in decision-making processes. Various theories of democracy primarily revolve around the fundamental principle of “government by the people,” which involves the direct involvement of individuals in making decisions that impact their lives and shape the social landscape. In the words of Bühlmann (2008), democracy is a system that preserves political sovereignty among the people, allowing citizens to exercise it directly. The etymology of the term "democracy" dates back to ancient Greece, where "demokratia" combines "demos," meaning "the people," with "kratos," meaning "government," "power," or "force." In essence, democracy is a system in which people engage in governance through direct participation or by electing representatives at regular intervals. It embodies the ideals of being a government "of the people, by the people and for the people". There are two distinct but interconnected forms of democracy: minimalist democracy, aimed at ensuring fair and effective governance, and maximalist democracy, which includes government entirely led by and for the people, characterized by greater representation, greater participation and greater potential for social justice. The Similarities Between Minimalist and Maximalist Democracies Both maximalist and minimalist interpretations of democracy share fundamental principles. First, they recognize that the protection of fundamental freedoms and human rights is integral to the functioning of a democratic system. Human rights thrive within a democratic framework, allowing the population to formulate the laws that govern them and exercising public control over the three branches of government: legislative, executive and judicial. Fundamentally, human rights are most effective when state authority is accompanied by autonomy and independence, ensuring equal treatment of all individuals before the law. Therefore, in any democratic system, maintaining a clear separation of powers is essential to guarantee the autonomy and independence of the judiciary. These components – democracy, human rights and separation of powers – are strictly interdependent. Second, both maximalist and minimalist democracies emphasize the importance of elections as the cornerstone of democratic governance. Electoral laws play a fundamental role in organizing and supervising elections, governing the electoral process and allocating votes to the corresponding polling stations. Elections include active electoral rights andpassive: the former give citizens the right to vote, while the latter guarantee them the right to stand for elections. Free democratic elections are characterized by citizens' unlimited ability to choose from a wide range of candidates or parties, ensuring a fair and transparent process. This allows individuals to choose their leaders through free and fair elections, a hallmark of both forms of democracy. Third, they support the rule of law as a fundamental aspect of democratic governance. The rule of law emphasizes the existence of essential principles and procedures that safeguard individual freedoms and facilitate political engagement. At the heart of this concept is the notion of personal freedom and freedom of expression, which ensures that state power is regulated by law. The rule of law directly opposes the idea of ​​a “police state” or “despotic state,” as it guarantees equality before the law, including for government employees and officials. In a democratic state, every citizen is equal in the eyes of the law, which gives them the power to participate fully in political life. Finally, both maximalist and minimalist democracies embrace the principle of separation of powers, which involves dividing state authority into three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. The legislative branch formulates and adopts laws, the executive branch enforces laws and government policies, and the judicial branch provides the legal framework for the exercise of power. The separation of powers serves as a system of checks and balances within a democratic state, allowing for effective control and influence of state power, primarily through self-regulation. The distribution of state power and the specific responsibilities of each body are generally outlined in a country's constitution. In general, two systems of government prevail: the “parliamentary regime” and the “presidential regime”. Both aim to ensure a fair and transparent distribution of state authority between various bodies. The differences between minimalist and maximalist democracies In the parliamentary system of government, the government derives its authority from the elected parliament, which represents the will of the people. Ministers within the government can also hold a dual mandate. Importantly, parliament has the power to both establish and dissolve government. The responsibilities of government and parliament are often intertwined, with the government generally responsible for drafting and proposing legislation. However, the fate of these bills is ultimately in the hands of Parliament, which must vote on them. As a result, the government relies on parliament to pass the laws it presents. Furthermore, political parties play a fundamental role, since a majority in parliament is a prerequisite for obtaining government positions. As Hetherington (2009) notes, the concept of democracy is highly controversial and leads to various definitions and measurements of democracy. Different research projects, such as Polity IV and Freedom House, use different definitions, resulting in distinct measurements of democracy, including minimalist and maximalist approaches. The minimalist perspective might consider democracy simply as a system of periodic elections and measure the presence or absence of elections in different countries. In contrast, the maximalist approach incorporates a broader definition of democracy, which includes factors such as protection of rights, freedom of the press and separation of powers. It evaluates the presence or absence of these elements and aggregates the scores to evaluate the status and degree of democracy of a country. Although the definitions minimalist and maximalist present,.