Bath&Body Works, Aveda, Elf Cosmetics, Lush. These are just a small portion of the brands that are all officially Cruelty-Free. This means that animals are harmed or killed in the process of producing their products. “They live in their cages, covered in blood from the symptoms of test poisoning, until the moment they die alone and in agony.” That is why I, on the positive side of this debate, support the resolution that the FDA should eliminate the use of animal testing. For the purposes of this discussion, the terms are as follows: ScienceDirect.com describes the Read-Across method scientists predict the drug's effect based on similar chemical reactions and past experiments In vitro: Safe tests performed in test tubes using human tissue and Animal Welfare Act (AWA) cells; “Requires minimum standards of care and treatment expected for certain animals.” My first argument is that animal testing is more expensive than alternative options. (Repeat). Animal testing is incredibly expensive and this money comes out of our bank account, as part of our taxes. It is estimated that the United States spends approximately $13-16 billion per year on animal testing alone. Crazy, I know. Well, some common alternatives are methods like Read-Across, advanced computer modeling techniques, and in vitro experiments. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Proof of my thesis that animal testing is more expensive than alternative options is a quote from SCIENCEDIRECT.com. This article essentially stated that between $50 and $70 million had been saved by performing 261 Read-Across methods, instead of testing on animals. A chart found on HumaneSocietyInternational.org shows that the cost for an animal test on sister chromatid exchange costs about $22,000. On the other hand, tests with the in vitro method cost only $8,000. Most of these in vitro tests are not only cheaper, but also more reliable and effective. New technology and equipment have allowed scientists to create artificial skin, like human skin, and to test certain chemicals or products. And at a much more affordable price. Not only are these new options more convenient, but the results are also more efficient and faster. “Faster testing times help bring products to market faster, so manufacturers can see a return on their investment sooner. Animal-free testing also reduces costs by reducing the need for purchasing, housing, feeding and caring for animals.” So, as you can see, all these alternative methods are significantly cheaper than animal testing. My second argument is that animal testing is an act of harm and cruelty towards the animals being tested on. As you probably already know, when animals are used for testing, they are constantly prodded and teased. These animals spend most of their time suffering excruciating pain, feeling unhappy. “US law allows animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, drowned, addicted to drugs and brain damaged. No experiment, no matter how painful or trivial, is prohibited - and painkillers are not required." These experiments and tests are a form of abuse and torment for innocent animals. Many of the animals tested end up developing some sort of behavioral disease 2019.