The answer to this question remains in the variables that have actually led China to be seen as economic development and not towards democratization. The first fact is that China is a developing country and its continuation is growing even today. According to statistics, China's economy is the second in the world, if calculated on the GDP the PPP is the first in the world. This economic development success occurred under China's one-party system. The country is known for not sharing any democratic or even humanitarian values ​​to displace the regime. Huntington tries to explain China in the same terms as modernization theory, but in reality the consequences of the variables in China are less significant than in South Korea. The other factor is based on social comparison which led to corruption in society. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Social comparison is corruption between classes. Regarding corruption, the only approach remains that the government did not use the support of society (democratic value). Regarding the unbalanced distribution obstacle, the government emphasizes the society these days and wants to solve it through the procedure of increasing the minimum wage. It is a right factor to give importance to the society, however it will have to increase its perspective from democracy to get rid of corruption. From this point of view, the article nevertheless attempts to take inspiration from Huntington's point of view to analyze the chances of China's democratization, if one day this happens.[1] Economic progress and economic variables could endanger the authoritarian regime, however, no longer able to build a democratic system or even start the process of democratization. On the contrary, it could lead leaders to eradicate opposing opposing forces to preserve the communist system. If Chinese society becomes stronger, it may be able to convince the federal government to carry out political reform through a middle-ground approach. And it will have to be a positive aspect of China's democratization. This corresponds to what Huntington said: "economic development makes democracy feasible." According to Huntigton, the effect of faith and Confucianism caused enormous debate and influence on the democratization process. The example of trying to implement belief in Falung Gong in China influenced Huntington's variable must be justified to some extent. Falun Gong has been repressed by the Chinese government for a long time, and this difficulty in pursuing freedom of belief attracts people's attention. Some people criticize the concept of Confucianism which is undoubtedly one of the reasons why China cannot become a democratic country while the other group of human beings argue that Confucianism is compatible with democracy. However, the pluralism and tolerance function within the typical culture of Confucianism have overall failed to achieve inclusive coverage but keep society united and in order in China's history. While elements of Confucianism may be present in Chinese politics, suggestions from the West may alter the way Chinese leaders govern. Authoritarianism will still be the principle as the Chinese government seeks to maintain stability between economic development and “democratization” in Chinese terms. This form of tendency to resist the wave of democracy would naturally convey the type of protest and reform of society. The transition of US politics has.