Topic > The reasons for the invasion of Iraq in 2003

The agreement between the United States and Great Britain to go to war with Iraq in 2003 was and remains one of the most controversial foreign policy decisions of the American government. It remains questionable whether, between the attacks, war was a justifiable gesture, considering the fundamentally different opinions on the position of the global community at the time. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay on the Iraq War, also known as the Second Persian Gulf War, which occurred from 2003 to 2011. The Iraq War was a two-phase war in Iraq. The first was a short, conventionally conducted war in March–April 2003, in which a combination of US and British troops along with the help of other smaller contingents from several other countries joined forces to invade Iraq and quickly defeat the Iraqi military and paramilitaries. forces. Following the invasion and defeat of the Iraqi army, a wave of looting erupted in major Iraqi cities, primarily targeting government offices and other public institutions. With these serious outbursts of violence, there are both common criminal violence and repressive acts against the former ruling clique. What is fascinating about Iraqi political discourse is how little it has changed in the past dozen years. Even though it has caused huge changes within our country. The underlying ethical problem in running an authoritarian and destructive outlaw state equipped with weapons of mass destruction remains essentially the same. According to Gerard F. Powers (2019). The United States and the Middle East are still paying the price for our political perversions in Iraq, from the Big Lie to abuses to sectarian violence. To give a similar example, the Second World War produced an ethic of unity and collective commitment with its common contributions in all sectors of society, the sense that there was an “us” that transcended individualism and selfishness to serving a higher purpose. This philosophy was completely and definitively erased from public consciousness due to the war in Iraq, which was already under pressure in the following years. Back then, the Iraq War seemed to be the final step toward creating a “go for number one” mentality. There is broad consensus that a ruthless tyrant was neutralized by removing Saddam Hussein from power. But the debate over why the United States entered the war has become increasingly bitter. The Bush administration still vigorously makes the case for killing Saddam. According to his critics, the failure to find weapons of mass destruction or the links between Saddam and al-Qaeda are two key elements in the case for war. Which is confirmation that the government may have misled citizens about the threat posed by Iraq. And the continued bombing in Iraq, as well as the rapidly rising costs of the occupation, which have so far exceeded $100 billion, have led those who originally supported the invasion to reconsider their decision. Universities, trade unions, religious groups, charities and activist groups have rallied against the US/UK-led invasion and occupation of Iraq since September 2002, creating the strongest anti-war campaign in history. On February 15, 2003, between 6 and 11 million people gathered in at least 650 cities around the world to demonstrate against the United States' attempt to invade Iraq. It was the largest protest against the conflict and is the largest single-day international uprising the world has ever seen. Americans opposed the invasion of Iraq for various reasons.'