Index IntroductionReduce CO2 emissions for mother natureVariantHotterRain and fallHurricanesSea level risingConclusionIntroductionWith the rise of electric cars and the awareness that CO2 emissions are seriously becoming a problem. More and more people are starting to worry and ask the question: should there be a ban on the sale of fossil fuel cars? The port company in Rotterdam wants to reduce CO2 emissions by 85-90% by 2050, while in Amsterdam it intends to ban scooter access from the city center. The Netherlands has pledged to adopt a law banning the sale of petrol, diesel and hybrid cars after 2030. Britain is also concerned about air quality and has pledged to ban the sale of petrol cars and diesel by 2040. this plan in July 2017 and calls for banning the sale of all vehicles unless they emit near-zero amounts of CO2. They decided to make this move because every year there are 40,000 premature deaths due to high level of air pollution, 9,000 of these people live in London and therefore they plan to take additional measures for London. So I will write from different perspectives about the plans to ban the sale of petrol and diesel cars and how they will affect different people, somewhat as illustrated above. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Governments of many countries are thinking about or are already planning ways to reduce CO2 gas emissions in the future. They do it because it slows down the warming of the planet and therefore also the melting of the polar ice caps and above all due to health concerns, which lead to monetary worries. These monetary concerns include for example: People get sick more often due to poor air quality. What will he think? The progress of the electric car industry has been stopped and slowed down for a long time by large companies like Shell and BP. Since it is not in their interest to promote these developments in the industry, if the electric car branch started to take over the fuel vehicle branch, it would be a disaster for Shell. They are somewhat of a nemesis of car brands like Tesla with electric motors and therefore are not at all reliable on gas prices and gas. With the advent of electric cars and laws that will ban fuel-powered cars, doomsday is approaching for big oil companies. So how would it affect them? Guy Outen, Head of Strategy and Portfolio at Shell, commented on this. “Put a price on carbon, stand back and watch the race of technology to find the cheapest solution,” Outen said. He believes that we shouldn't actually try to ban fossil fuel cars, but instead focus on capturing the gases emitted by freight and aviation, rather than cars. Because these are not as likely to be replaced as soon as cars, because these are multi-million dollar ships and are not as easily replaced or customized to not emit as much CO2 gases. Shell doesn't appear to be as concerned about this change as you might expect because it has already invested heavily in things like wind farms and other green energy initiatives. They invested so much in this stuff because they saw it coming and they have people dealing with this kind of stuff 24/7 and so they had the idea to go with the flow of green energy. What are the health benefits of reducing the amount of CO2 gas emitted? According to the warden this could potentially prevent deathpremature of 40,000 British citizens. So this could have a dramatic impact on other countries too. When the production of CO2 gas from fossil fuel-powered power plants and vehicles is seriously reduced, other co-pollutants will also be reduced, some of the most important being sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx). , which play an important role in the formation of fine airborne particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone, both of which are particularly harmful to health. PM2. 5 and ozone cause premature death and other adverse health effects such as chronic bronchitis; non-fatal heart attacks; hospitalizations for cardiopulmonary diseases, asthma or cardiovascular events. It has been calculated and estimated that if CO2 emissions from US power plants alone were reduced by 24%, this would reduce NOx and SO2 emissions by 26-28% and by 2030 the following would be avoided: 2,700 – 6,300 premature deaths 140,000 flare-ups of asthma in children1,600 emergency room visits for asthma 290,000 days of work lost 180,000 days of school lost; and 2,400 hospital admissions for cardiovascular or respiratory symptoms. The estimated monetary value of these co-health benefits in 2030 alone is between $25 billion and $59 billion ($2011). Reducing CO2 emissions not only significantly and rapidly reduces harmful co-pollutants, saves lives, and avoids other negative health impacts, but also saves the economy more billions of dollars in healthcare costs than it costs to reduce emissions. Given these co-benefits, it makes sense to urgently and significantly reduce CO2 emissions. If we drastically reduced our CO2 emissions overall, we could potentially also stop the earth's warming or at least slow it down significantly. Stopping or slowing down climate change has a huge effect, it will help us preserve many animal species and prevent them from becoming extinct due to something unnatural. Reducing CO2 emissions for mother natureThe effect of climate change is already notable globally. Glaciers are melting until there is almost nothing left, lakes and riverbeds no longer have ice in the winter, the distribution of plants and animals has changed, and trees are flowering earlier. The effects that climate change scientists had predicted have finally come into play: decreasing ocean ice, therefore higher sea levels and even hotter heat waves during the summer. These scientists are almost certain that temperatures around the world will continue to peak and rise, mainly due to human gas emissions. The IPCC predicts a temperature increase of 2.5-10º Fahrenheit over the next 100 years. “The IPCC predicts that global average temperature increases of less than 1.8 to 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit (1 to 3 degrees Celsius) above 1990 levels will become a real problem and will have a significant impact in some regions and dangerous in others. Some of the long-term effects that climate change will have on the United States are: Variables. The extent of climate change damage is determined primarily by the amount of heat-trapping gases emitted. Because the amount of heat emitted by humans is stored in a variable climate, temperature increases will not be gradual, and neither will the effects be gradual. Warmer The length of the frost-free season (and the corresponding growing season) has been increasing nationwide since then. in the 1980s, with the largest increases occurring in the western United States, impacting ecosystems and agriculture. Across the United States, the growing season is expected to continue to lengthen. The situation.