Representation Using another person's work or culture for personal gain is known as appropriation. Appropriation is an important but difficult topic to address at times. Society encounters these complications with works of art, cultural factors, and with equitable representation of race. A negative connotation can be given to the theme of appropriation, a sense of exclusion of fashion and artistic freedom for some races. The negative view of appropriation is due to the lack of representation and insensitivity of some people towards the oppression of racial groups. However, it is important for younger generations to remain educated in the ethics of appropriation. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay A smart way to navigate and examine the political context is, as stated in Fusco Politics of Appropriation, to ask the question, “who is crossing over and who benefits from it?” In this way, if the artist gains money or acclaim from someone else's work, this would be classified as appropriation “Cultural appropriation is as much a political act as a formal operation or language game” (Fusco Politics of Appropriation). ).One way artists can borrow and engage the arts of certain artists and cultural groups in a respectful and equitable way would be through cultural appreciation for the artist himself or herself group of people from which it comes, this would be known as cultural appreciation. As Fusco should have done in her film “Paris is Burning”. Appropriation is a useful practice only when drawing inspiration from another artist's work to create new art. Misrepresentation of race and gender remains evident in the entertainment industry. How about truly representing trans people? The misrepresentation of all genders continues especially in television and film. Producers may be afraid to take risks in casting trans actors in cis-gender roles for fear of negative reactions from the media or viewers. Race-related issues include cultural misinterpretation and simply a lack of visibility for cultural groups. For example, in films like “Ghost in the Shell” and “The Great Wall,” Caucasian actors play originally Asian characters. A major problem is that the directors believe that famous actors like Matt Damon and Scarlett Johansson will bring more money to the film, but completely ignore the apparent cultural appropriation of their casting. One possible solution to this epidemic would be to remain “color-conscious,” meaning being aware of historic discrimination in the entertainment industry and what it means to put a body of color on stage (Authenticity in Casting, LA Times). Our cultural dynamic today is so complex that everyone should see a version of themselves in the TV shows and movies they're watching. A common conception would be that art and culture are completely accessible and usable by anyone. After all, the appropriation of art and culture is not that different, because art is a reflection of culture, which explains the sensitivity sometimes required to create art. A prevailing idea in the arts community is that cultural appropriation deals primarily with fashion and hair, while artistic appropriation is more simply about the theft of ideas. Picasso, one of the most famous artists of the last century, used black aesthetics and jazz culture in his work due to the advent of African “art” in Europe (My Black Death). He showed his.