Topic > Comparison between cross-country skiing and track and field

Running is God's blessing to man that allows us to move our legs quickly to escape furious bears. A basic instinct transformed into a rivalry so sweet that you can actually taste the endorphins and lactic acid as it develops. Old Greece would agree. The Olympic Games production included several athletic occasions that tested the physical qualities of the fittest man. Occasions included throwers, jumpers, contenders, riders and runners. The Olympics have a significant impact on interests in aggressive running, track and distance running, cross country. Non-sprinters here and there referred to as "football players" or "team boosters" often get confused about the definitions and contrasts between track and field and cross-country. While there are similarities between the two games, track and cross country contain several factors that make them new to competitors. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The most noticeable thing between the two games is that they both only include racing. Unlike other games, track (excluding field occasions) and cross-country require very little hardware. In running games, a competitor cannot rely on an increasingly expensive racket or thicker cushions to become a superior player. Track and cross country competitors are totally dependent on their preparation, training, perseverance and ability to manage an event. It's simply them and their way of running. A misinterpretation by non-sprinters about track or cross-country skiing is that it isn't even a group activity; this is a typical statement used to make any sprinter's head spin with anger. Both are a group activity equivalent to baseball, football, or cheerleading—or, if you think about it, a game. Track transfers require a stick to be passed along the track between the hands of 4 sprinters after they have performed a specific separation. Without a complete transfer group, the rest of the group is naturally preempting. In cross country, with a total of 5 runners, you run in a group. In cross country, a runner doesn't win; the group with the least number of focuses takes home the title. Cross country is more like a team sport. Track and cross-country runners train and do so in groups, making it a group activity. The two games are rationally and physically tough, you have to be mentally strong to play the two sports. The contrasts between trail and cross-country are what make them trail and cross-country. One contrast is the length of the races. On the track a race can be anywhere from 100 meters to 3200 meters (2 miles). The track is mostly made up of shorter runs with the addition of a couple of "long distances" (800m, mile, 2mile), but that's a walk in the rec center compared to the 3K, 5K, 8K and 10K of the cross-country skiing. (6.2 miles). Preparation for track separation includes initial/square holes, short runs, and frame running. Preparation for cross-country skiing includes long runs, mile repeats, and downhill runs. Another differentiating variable is the environment in which you run track and cross country. The track takes place on a composite track and becomes long: it can last up to two days. Cross-country skiing is only done on grass and outdoor trails, which are substantially more difficult to navigate. A standard 5K (3.1 mile) race typically lasts less than 40 minutes, depending on the sprinters and course issues. Another contrast between the two is the sprinters' eating routine. THE.