IndexIntroductionRelated ResearchConclusionsIntroductionIn the year 1692 an incident led to the execution of twenty people and even two hundred more people accused of witchcraft. These injustices had prevailed in society and people would be accused and killed at random because people believed that witchcraft was a punishable crime like the others. In the most bizarre events in American history, the Salem trials had become completely rampant and even influenced court decisions (Levin, 1955). Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay However by 1933 common sense prevailed and most people argued that witchcraft would not be a punishable crime since supernatural forces could not be used as evidence in a court of law. Before the trials concluded, many malicious killings and cases of people being hanged after being accused of being witches had occurred in the Salem community. The article will basically address the various injustice trials of Salem and will also provide logical conclusions about these trials. Related Research The initial events of these Salem trials began when a number of young girls in a particular community contracted a strange disease in February 1962. Some of the possible and famous symptoms include feverish aches and even pain. At that point the medical examination could have directly demonstrated that it was a bad flu. However, these symptoms progressed further and became more volatile causing the girls to scream and even contort their bodies into strange positions by crawling under furniture. They were also heard making strange sounds and claiming to have been pricked by pins. In an effort to examine and find the cause of these strange behaviors, a local doctor carefully examined the girls and claimed that they were inflicted by a supernatural witchcraft force (Blumberg, 2007). In the seventh century the Salems were known for blaming witchcraft. of the evils of the world and persecuted even those who were held responsible for these evils. As the mysteries continued, the girls blamed three women for afflicting them with these strange diseases and thus the Salem trials began. Some of the first three women to face these charges were Sarah, Tibuta, Good and Osborne. These women were seen as outcasts in the community and this made them an easy target for people in the Salem community who spread rumors that they were the ones who had bewitched the girls and even forced them to suffer from these strange diseases and even make strange emits night sounds. Both Sarah Good and Sarah Osborne strongly denied it and even stated that they had no association with witchcraft or even the devil. However Tibuta in the central statement declared that indeed the devil had visited him and all he needed was to serve him. (Warshow, 1953) . She did this to spark a debate and also believed that this could prevent her from being further beaten and she would go to prison to avoid being killed. When she admitted to being a witch, all three were sentenced to prison. Chaos erupted, and in subsequent months many people were arrested on witchcraft charges for bewitching young girls in Salem. However, no one was watertight against these accusations when a famous churchgoer was accused of witchcraft and people began to panic. This is because the detection of even innocent people who had no history ofwitchcraft. When people needed to remove someone from a leadership position, they went ahead to make sure they were falsely accused of witchcraft and even ended up in prison. The basic assumption was that if Martha Corey, a famous church practitioner, was accused of witchcraft, then virtually everyone else in the Salem community would likely face the same charges because she was seen and perceived as the most religious. As more and more allegations were brought before the courts and responsible authorities, people from Salem and even surrounding areas were questioned. Many of the accused, however, were simply unable to defend themselves because these charges were simply biased in nature and it was also very difficult to prove whether an individual was present or not. It was pathetic that the authorities allowed false evidence such as gossip and other simply unsupported evidence and claims. For example, dreams and visions of people who are believed to decode witchcraft would be used against people and victims and these sets of evidence in the present day would not constitute any form of solid evidence against people. For example, even after Rebecca Nurse had provided sufficient evidence that was beyond a reasonable doubt to prove that she was not guilty, the judge presiding over this trial decided to reconvene the jury to reconsider the established facts. To the surprise of many, after the trial the nurse was found guilty and even sentenced to hang. It was now clear that those who were weak and timid in justifying their association with witchcraft would surely be hanged, killed or condemned. In the year 1692, frenzied executions were conducted and an elderly man was crushed to death with heavy stones. There seemed to be no end to these murders and prejudicial trials until the then educator and president of Harvard College begged the court to reconsider their decision ever since. there was no room for testimony and evidence that included dreams or even visions. In his publication he also stated that it would be better to release ten suspected witches than to kill one innocent person. In response to Mather's appeal, then-Massachusetts Governor William Phipps finally put an end to these unjust and unfair trials by suspending all trials and even releasing all people accused of witchcraft in May 1963. This action was widely welcomed by the people and also put an end to the prejudicial killings that have occurred. Both religion and the church played an important role in facilitating these trials because most of the accused were thought to be sinners and those who did not go to church. The trials also became personal and those who were in conflict with church norms and tradition would easily be victimized and even driven mad to undergo trials. Solid, tangible evidence must be well integrated before a judge can fully find someone guilty. From a critical point of view witchcraft is unverifiable and no evidence can be used to prove whether someone is a witch or not. In the case of the three girls, for example, the medical examination would have shown that they were suffering from a bad flu and not witchcraft as many had claimed. During the 17th century religion also played an important role in determining who was right and who was wrong, which was totally against their free will and ability to make decisions and live their lives as each desired. Conclusions In conclusion, the Salem trials were clearly unfair. Witchcraft was not verifiable and no one could affirm that it.