IndexArguments in favor of raising the school leaving ageArguments against raising the school leaving ageA balanced approachConclusionEducation is fundamental for development and success of individuals as well as for the progress of society. The question of the school leaving age has been the subject of debate for some time. While some argue that raising the school leaving age would improve the quality of education and reduce social problems, others believe it would be ineffective and could have negative consequences. This essay will examine the arguments for and against raising the school leaving age and propose a balanced approach to this issue. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Arguments for raising the school-leaving age Supporters of raising the school-leaving age argue that this would ensure that students receive a sufficient level of education before entering the workforce or pursuing further education. It is believed that by increasing the age at which students can legally leave school, they would be better prepared to face the challenges of adult life. This could lead to higher levels of academic achievement and better employment prospects, ultimately reducing the likelihood of poverty and crime. Furthermore, raising the school leaving age could help address the problem of under-qualified workers in the labor market. With rapid advances in technology and the increasing complexity of the global economy, it is essential that individuals have a solid educational foundation in order to compete in the job market. By staying in school for a longer period, students would have the opportunity to gain the skills and knowledge needed to succeed in the modern workforce. Arguments against raising the school dropout age On the other hand, opponents of raising the school dropout age argue that it may not be effective to address the root causes of poor academic achievement and high dropout rates. Simply increasing the age at which students can leave school does not necessarily address underlying problems such as lack of support, motivation and curriculum relevance. Indeed, this could lead to increased frustration and disengagement among students who are not academically inclined, ultimately resulting in higher dropout rates. Furthermore, raising the leaving age could violate individual freedom and autonomy. Not all students thrive in the traditional school environment, and some may be better suited to alternative forms of education or vocational training. By forcing these students to remain in school against their will, this could lead to resentment and a negative attitude towards education, ultimately undermining the goal of promoting lifelong learning. A balanced approach Instead of simply raising the school leaving age, a more balanced approach to tackling the problem The issue of dropout rates would involve addressing the underlying causes of academic underachievement and disengagement. This could include implementing targeted interventions to support at-risk students, improve curriculum relevance and flexibility, and provide alternative pathways to education and training for those who do not thrive in the traditional school environment. Additionally, it is important to recognize that education is not just about outcomes.