Although in some states there are no executions, the sentence has remained contralateral. Different people have different options regarding the death penalty. There are those who agree while others oppose. Polls conducted to prove or disapprove the case of death sentence have different options, some argue that death sentences are a positive way of justice while others consider death penalty as an uncivilized way of sanctioning murder cases. Death sentence being a controversial topic among many people, it is a fifty percent rumor and fifty percent study as no one knows who is right or wrong regarding the death penalty discussion. In this research paper there are reviews of both the advantages and disadvantages of the death penalty as most Americans recognize it. The document will exploit the fact that the death penalty is nothing more than a belief and thought of most of the people who contributed to it and whether who is right or wrong is a question for many. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay To understand why most people have different opinions on the death penalty case, a brief history of the key topic will be presented in this article. In most nations of the world, there were many methods of applying the death penalty. People who broke laws or morals could be punished in different ways than they were. Most of the commonly used traditional methods of sentencing included poisoning, strangulation, suffocation, stoning, starvation, boiling in boiling oil, burial alive, and, in the recent past, the introduction of electrocution by use of chamber gases or through poisonous substances. injections. These methods were fortunately cruel and were not widely known to traditionalist Americans, and most of the death sentences were adopted by the United Kingdoms in Europe. In most cases most of these executions were carried out publicly, where most of the drunken men would gather and watch the executions take place. All crimes against states, persons, property, or public harmony in English law were therefore punishable by death. These crimes are all in the current U.S. Constitution. In the early eighteenth century, theft of small sums of money remained a petty crime throughout the nineteenth century in Britain. The United States Constitution prohibits uncommon punishment under the Amendment Bill of Rights. While the issue of the death penalty has remained an oft-discussed topic by many, it may not be surprising that in the mid-nineteenth century there were campaigns to eliminate death sentences. In the year 1846, the states of Rhode Island and Michigan abolished the death penalty (Reggio 2014). However, as most states have banned the death penalty, some have implemented new forms of execution for the condemned. Over time most anti-death penalty campaigns slowed as some states such as Arizona and Washington reinstated death sentences in the years 1917 to 1955. These saw the execution of Gee Jon, an assassin in the War of Tong. Electric chairs and hanging chairs were now becoming common forms of execution (Regigio 2014). Bibliographic note. In an essay by (Carmical & Casey, 2011) the authors state that death penalties are acceptable and that the determination of morality is right or wrong. Therefore it was legitimate to execute a murderer. The author also clarifies that executions.