IndexIntroductionArgumentsCounterargumentArgument vs CounterargumentConclusionIntroductionLaws and rules govern sports to make it more fun and ensure that participants use their skills to compete. There is a reason why there are so many sports and the reason is that not everyone is talented enough to succeed in all sports, but an individual chooses the best sport that suits his well-being and learns the rules of the game to perfect himself . the skill and talent they have. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Athletes have the ability to choose the game they like and the fact that not everyone is directly involved in the sport means it's not a life and death issue but get involved where possible. Athletes should be able to compete to their own personal standards to ensure competitiveness, which makes matches more lively and attractive to watch. Athletes should not be allowed to use performance-enhancing drugs or techniques. This argumentative paper provides a detailed focus on some of the main reasons why athletes should not be allowed to use performance-enhancing drugs or techniques. The incidence of performance-enhancing drugs has been reported since the first episode of the Olympic Games. The main reason why people resort to using performance-enhancing drugs or techniques is mainly to have an advantage against their cheating rivals. Cheating is a vice that is not encouraged anywhere, not even among academics. This means that allowing the use of performance-enhancing drugs would create a very difficult environment in which it would be difficult to obtain accurate results based on the abilities of different individuals. The beauty of every sport is seeing someone do better than another and therefore even if doping drugs were legalized, the situation would not change. This is mainly due to the fact that individuals would be encouraged differently and therefore there will always be first and last, meaning that no significant change would have developed within such encouragement. The argumentative approach that would be adopted in this case will focus on the deductive approach to create a meaningful understanding by reading the main issue that is developing in this case. The deductive approach in this case will provide arguments from a general perspective to a more specific perspective where it would be much easier to relate to the different level of attention considered in this paper. Arguments Performance-enhancing drugs provide unfair competition within sports. Nobody is forced to practice a certain sport. A key factor that pushes an individual into sport is the knowledge that they are talented enough and therefore can be successful. There is a common belief that even if athletes compete in the same sport, there are variations in their ability to perform better in a given sport. These variations make the game more interesting and create a high level of self-satisfaction when a winner declares himself to have won fairly without the use of any performance-enhancing drugs. In an event where performance enhancing drugs are used, it will create a very difficult environment where it would be possible to tell the difference between highly skilled athletes and less skilled athletes. The unfair competition that is created in this case will provide a boring environmentwhich will be very difficult to control the flow of the game which is an important aspect (Gaffney, 2013). Every athlete always works hard to be the best and the use of performance enhancing drugs will limit this morale and high level of motivation that athletes usually have when aiming for success. It is important to ensure that only those who are able to compete compete in that particular sport as it is not necessary for an individual to participate in a particular game. If an individual is unable, they should let those who can compete do so without focusing on drugs or performance-enhancing techniques. Competition must be regulated and ensure that it attracts a high level of professionalism. Overall commitment to sport is a choice and is not mandatory for anyone. Performance-enhancing drugs pose significant health risks to athletes. Sports should be fun, where both the athlete and fans find happiness and satisfaction through how they perform their tasks. Incorporating performance enhancing drugs is more like enabling the abuse of drugs as they tend to have major negative effects for users. It's not a big thing to consider within the sports industry where athletes take drugs. The short-term benefits might be satisfactory, but it is necessary to ensure that the lives of athletes are well taken care of considering the fact that athletes' lives are more important than sports. Therefore the overall focus on this case should be developed specifically to ensure that there is satisfaction on both sides where the athletes can be able to revisit their success in the old days and find total satisfaction from their performances which were their efforts without any form of assist (Gabbett et al., 2017). Once the use of performance-enhancing drugs by athletes is permitted, it will be difficult to control the levels required to have equal use of the drugs among all athletes. This will present a very difficult focus in the world of sports. It will be necessary to put in place crucial measures that will track the levels of drugs used by athletes. These aspects will be very difficult to monitor considering that all athletes will be trying to use different levels of medication. Injustice will continue to exist in the game and so it will be easier to run a free performance-enhancing sports industry than an industry that has lost focus. where athletes use drugs within the significant limits in force. A fun sport is one in which athletes have varying natural strength and compete based on their personal understanding and what they hope to integrate into the sporting environment (Greely et al., 2013). Performance enhancing drugs and techniques will lead to very lazy athletes. Athletes are usually motivated by the equal chances they have when participating with others, and as a result, they always put in a lot of effort to ensure that they are winners. Athletes are always known to be hard workers, a key characteristic welcomed within society. Society is supposed to develop based on real, factual information without significant shortcuts that will always ultimately be harmful to those who participate. A society based on shortcuts where they are willing to do anything for success, even if it means cheating, will create a very difficult environment where young people can grow up knowing exactly what needs to be considered to create better focus and positive elements (Jordan & Audia, 2012). Allow drugs for the improvement ofperformance will limit the level of motivation and hard work as drugs will play a greater role in converting laziness into success which is not an important thing to consider especially in today's society where there are many issues that have created a very difficult environment in which better decisions can be made. People tend to focus on easy options that have a detrimental impact on their well-being. Drug use has never had any long-term positive impact on users and considering many years that athletes are involved in the game, frequent drug use will automatically have an impact on their health (Ziltener, Leal and Fournier, 2010). Allowing the use of performance enhancing drugs will not have any significant change on outcomes in the sporting environment. The goal of drugs in sports is usually to ensure that a given athlete has an advantage over others and can therefore be more successful. However, it is important to understand that this attention is mainly due to the fact that they are used secretly where an advantage can be developed by the athlete using these performance enhancers. Performance enhancing drugs will not be available to a specific population of athletes but will be available to everyone. Performance enhancing drugs tend to improve everyone's performance differently depending on the level of engagement among users. This means that high-performing people without the drugs will remain even higher performers when using the drugs. Therefore, there will be no significant difference unless the rules are changed where low performers are granted the ability to use while high performers are denied the ability to create some sort of equilibrium. It is also important to understand that there have been cases where individuals caught using drugs have been defeated. This means that the use of medications may not necessarily translate into success (Outram & Stewart, 2013). Counterargument Technology is integrated into sport and the main purpose of technology in sport is to be used. The use of performance enhancement is mainly aimed at improving the sports environment where it would be important to have positive engagement with different actors in the sports industry. Injustice already exists within sports, especially considering the fact that the training methods used by athletes vary significantly. This is a form of injustice in the world of sports that has not been addressed. This raises significant questions when the issue of performance enhancing drugs and techniques is raised, people start talking about inequality and injustice without knowing that there is already injustice and a playing field that is not level, thus creating the existing problems. Therefore, it is very clear that allowing performance enhancing drugs and techniques does not destabilize the existing sporting environment (Petersen, 2010). The sports industry is improving and therefore there are crucial measures that are put in place to ensure that the sport develops effectively on all fronts. There has been no known negative impact of performance enhancing drugs on any athlete which may provide a better understanding of the claim that performance enhancing drugs are harmful to the health of athletes in the future. Argument Counter Argument Counter Argument The differences that exist in sports regarding the training method that are used by athletes are accepted by the rules that have been put in place and in the world of sports, the rules dictate..