Society desires the ability to make one's own decisions. Whether this is through free will or the freedom to make choices based on prior experience without restriction, the idea of ​​self-control over events that occur is valuable. However, both Psycho and Citizen Kane argue that our lives are completely dictated by parents, and the very first experiences humans have are the ones that shape and direct us the most. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Citizen Kane begins the story with his childhood, in which he is happily sledding in the background while his parents talk about sending him away with Thatcher for a proper education and a generous sum of money. The deep focus allows us to experience dramatic irony as they quickly sign the papers after hearing about the money deal, all while Kane plays with ignorance and bliss. Charles Foster Kane's mother tells him as he is sent away that "he could be the richest man in the world...". From the beginning, it's money that drives the story, and Charles' closest and most recognized people in the middle of isolated Colorado, as demonstrated by the blizzard that blows around their house with no one else in sight. It shows that from birth to death, Charles Kane was surrounded by money and people who were obsessed with it. The brazen accumulation of statues, the construction of Xanadu and his extravagant parties were a clear example of his materialism. However, perhaps the most psychologically interesting part of Citizen Kane is Susan Alexander's critique as she states that she doesn't want to be bought with money, but instead wants to go out and have fun. It implies that Kane's use of money was never to live a happier life, but instead a "better" one. In his attempt to show love to Susan, it seems like an attempt to buy her love and reflects how Kane's parents sold their love and bond with Kane for money. His only way of showing affection is what he has learned throughout his life, as demonstrated by the flashbacks to Christmas with Thatcher and the number of shares he received from Thatcher. There had never been a memory where they seemed to truly enjoy each other's company, because he had never truly been Kane's father, but instead a business partner of his. Kane was mad at him for depriving him of the life he could have had with his parents. It is not reasonable to say that Kane felt no love for Susan, as he particularly enjoyed her company because she liked him despite not knowing he was a newspaper magnate. However, he couldn't please her by trying to help her realize her dream of becoming a singer by building an opera house. The idea that Charles Foster Kane is a hollow character is completely false, as his character is so psychologically complex from his childhood and thus leads to his hollowness as a human being. The seemingly conflicting ideas about his death and his last words of “Rosebud,” an allusion to his childhood, at the beginning of the film undoubtedly refer to the end of his emotions. However, he realizes that his wife's abandonment and the loneliness he felt started at the very beginning of his life, and that is why the story begins with this. He was dead from the beginning and was incapable of being "human" to both his first and second wives. Psychopath and the portrait of "Mother" early in life are evident in Norman Bates and his incredibly awkward and off-kilter manner. -positioning lines. Speaking to the female protagonist about his.