IndexIntroductionNIPPMy Industry and the Threat of ChoiceEstablish goals and objectivesIdentify facilitiesAssess and analyze risksImplement risk management strategiesMeasure effectivenessConclusionIntroductionUnder US state law, facilities critical are primarily defined as any resource, system of resources of indispensable importance to the well-being and well-being of the country. The destruction of these critical facilities can have detrimental effects on the political, social, and economic position of the United States relative to other countries. The security of these critical facilities has therefore raised concerns about their protection from unplanned risks and dangers. In this way, Homeland Security is able to fulfill its obligation to protect these critical facilities from both internal and external threats. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The importance of critical structures is manifested by the fact that they control some significant and vital resources, which directly benefit a large number of individuals in the United States. Examples of these resources include; water, transport and electricity. Adequate care is, therefore, essential to protect these critical infrastructures from any emerging threats. The draft national security plan complies with the need to protect and safeguard the well-being of these critical facilities. NIPPNIPP stands for National Infrastructure Protection Plan. This is a federal government-led project with the goal of achieving a lasting solution to the continuing increase in threats to the country's critical facilities. There has been subsequent collaboration between the federal government and private key infrastructure owners. This is with the aim of achieving total security with respect to existing dangers and threats affecting critical infrastructures. President Obama, in 2013, called for the equal development of an updated national plan. This is to counter threats that had been reported in relation to the security of critical infrastructure in relation to dangers and risks. The president also called for an equivalent improvement in cybersecurity in critical infrastructure. It involved the coordination of owners of critical infrastructure, with the aim of regulating the sharing of vital information. The federal government has also decided to collaborate with owners of critical infrastructure, with the aim of implementing appropriate risk-based approaches to cybersecurity. My sector and the threat of choiceThe sector I choose is emergency services. Emergency services normally involve rapid response to threats caused by intentional faults, inadvertent faults and finally natural disasters. The emergency services sector "ESS" is known to include a system of adequate preparedness and immediate response in the equitable prevention and adequate mitigation of emerging and reported risks. The danger of the emergency services industry or ESS that I choose to discuss is “The Aircraft as a Weapon”. To justify this example, I would like to make close reference to a real historical event. During September 11, 2011, two passenger planes crashed into the World Trade Center complex. Bleach in the security field destroyed the military's international reputation and image. The United States suffered the loss of nearly 3,000 personnel and the loss of critical infrastructure worth about 10. billion dollars. Valid targets should therefore be incorporated to allow for equal preparedness in casesuch an accident happens again. [1]Establish goals and objectivesIn response to the risk under discussion, appropriate objectives should be incorporated to eliminate the likelihood or possibility of the tragedy recurring. An efficient risk management framework is therefore needed to ensure that critical infrastructure protection is carried out to avoid manipulation by any threat. With close reference to the NIPP, the particular risk management framework can be directly applied to the risk of “Aircraft as a Weapon”. Proper implementation of this framework will reduce the magnitude of losses incurred when a threat affects critical infrastructure. The federal government's primary purpose and objectives in this case are to create adequate foundations that will resist complete damage in similar circumstances. The dissemination and management of information will also need to be controlled so that threats can be identified before they become unmanageable. level. Security has also been tightened at places such as airports and airfields to eliminate the possibility of a possible “plane as a weapon” situation as a threat to national security. The NIPP also identifies a set of national targets for efforts to adequately mitigate risks. This with equal security and resilience compared to existing critical infrastructures. One example of this goal is to expand the existing partnership between private sector owners of critical infrastructure and the federal government. It is therefore critical to develop appropriate goals and objectives that will guide key institutions towards prosperity and continued success. Identify Infrastructure Identifying infrastructure in critical infrastructure is an important consideration as a step in addressing the risk at hand. Infrastructure includes resources and systems necessary for the continuous operation of critical infrastructure. With peer discussion and proper analysis of the risk management framework, it is clear that effective solutions to threats to critical infrastructure are needed. Therefore, the same security and resilience should be taken into consideration when designing assets, systems and networks. Buildings currently under development are expected to meet certain regulated standards and procedures. This will minimize the level of damage or loss caused by a repeat of such an event. Control systems in the infrastructure should also be designed so that they can accurately identify, deter, interrupt, detect and prepare for threats or hazards. You should therefore compare the best communication services and different operating models, choosing only the best ones, which are far from risks and well protected. This applies to my threat of the aircraft as a weapon, whereby an adequate infrastructure would have identified the threat before it occurred or minimized the extent of losses. Assess and Analyze Risks To enable the federal government and private sector partners to accurately and timely assess and analyze risks, reliable, accurate, and actionable information is needed to achieve desired outcomes. Combining value in understanding cyber and physical systems will help risk assessors reach valid conclusions about proposed remedies to such threats. Correct risk assessment and analysis is therefore necessary, in the sense that the risk assessment of critical infrastructures is carried out taking into account the threat, vulnerability and consequences. In close relation to the risk, the accident of the plane as a weapon occurred as a fruit of man's will through the terrorist act. The vulnerability of the “aircraft as a weapon” risk is that.