In the film entitled “Stanford Prison Experiment” the experiment aimed to study the psychological effects of prison life and students played the roles of guards and prisoners. Zimbardo structured the experiment so that everything seemed as realistic as possible. The students chosen as prisoners and guards were selected from 70 applicants who responded to Zimbardo's advertisement for test subjects. Those with psychological problems, disabilities, prior history, and a history of drug use were excluded. Only 24 met his criteria to take part in the experiment. They were all males of the same socioeconomic middle class and each was paid $15 per day for participation. A coin toss decided which volunteers would be incarcerated and which would be guards. Prisoner 416, the student who had been in solitary confinement, made this short, chilling statement. “I don't consider it an experiment or a simulation because it was a prison run by psychologists instead of the state. I began to feel that identity, the person I was who had decided to go to prison, was far from me. I was 416 years old. I was really my number.”, in this sense I can say that even if there are some inmates who are already adapting to the role of an inmate, there are still some people who still know themselves and identity. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Social influence and group conformity can also be seen in the film. Although the intent of the experiment was to examine imprisonment, its results were used to demonstrate the impressionability and obedience of people when provided with a legitimizing ideology and social and institutional support. This experiment began with the best scientific intentions, to find out whether the personality traits of prisoners and guards affected their life in prison, but it went awry after the participants lost their identities and fell deeply into the roles they were given. had been assigned. In many ways, the film is very interesting and really caught my attention. Crudup plays Zimbardo as an overzealous researcher who oversteps his bounds, trying to create a very specific outcome among the students he observes. The filmmakers even underline the fragility of the experimental project, inserting characters who emphasize that Zimbardo is not a disinterested observer. This film suggests that our behavior largely conforms to our preconceived expectations. All things being equal, we act how we think we should act, especially if that expectation comes from the person above. It can also be seen that the Stanford setting says that we should behave in a stereotypical and tough way, and we try hard to fit into that role. Tell us that we must not give up the hope of social mobility and let us act accordingly. The film is impressive considering the scope, historical legacy, and overall feel of an independent film. Unlike many historical films, many people have seen at least some of the authentic footage, which adds a certain standard to live up to. The film captures the look of the original corridor and cells, and most of the actors find a look that feels both realistic and period appropriate. And considering the restrictions imposed by filming in so few locations and doing most of the filming in narrow corridors, the visual variety they managed to create in front of the camera is to be applauded. I was particularly impressed by the sound effects used, which create the tension of the.