A summary on graffiti and street art Aren't graffiti, street art and vandalism the same thing? The “Art Attack” and “Urban Warriors” items differ. Written about street artists and street art itself, these articles both suggest that graffiti and street art are not the same as vandalism. In fact, the concept that street art is vandalism is completely erased in both articles, and both focus on the art forms that are both graffiti and street art. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay In galleries across America, street art is for sale. It is considered an art form especially in big cities but fans of street artists are all over America and even in different parts of the world. The first main point I would like to address is that street art and graffiti are actually forms of art. Although many dislike street art and consider it vandalism, one thing is for sure: it has a strong fan base, as any art form should. In the article “Art Attack” we talk about a street artist known to many as Banksy. Banksy is very popular and his artwork can sell for up to $300,000: “Banksy's Ruined Landscape, a pastoral scene with the slogan 'This is not a photo opportunity' pasted on, sold for $385,000 . A vandalized telephone booth, a real British telephone booth bent nearly 90 degrees and with bloody red paint where a pickaxe had pierced it, commanded $605,000” (Ellsworth-Jones p. 4). Banksy uses his art to speak to his viewers on a personal level and does a great job, as a result he has acquired quite a large fan base. As an art form, graffiti and vandalism are both very significant. Many works of art are made purely to reach an audience, whether it is to talk about politics, poverty or foreign affairs, graffiti and street art are both made with something in mind other than just creating something for fun. In the article Urban Warriors we talk about graffiti and the impact it has on all of us: “If we view graffiti solely as a criminal act and ignore the homogeneity of urban design that promotes a visual culture of advertising, property signs and policies propaganda we are losing the opportunity to reevaluate the space of the public sphere” (Loeffler page 73). Graffiti and street art challenge our opinions and give us many things as well as something to look at, as all art should. In fact, the “Art Attack” article says something similar to what “Urban Warriors” just said: “All graffiti is low-level dissent, but stencils have an added story. They have been used to start revolutions and stop wars” (Ellsworth-Jones p. 2 ). Simply put, stencils also have a huge impact and make us think. Many art forms require us to change the world, whether through the act of actually writing "change the world" in bold letters in the work itself, or by capturing the essence of something happening in the world that isn't right: which is exactly what graffiti and street artists do. Another important point of the article is that street art and graffiti both have a bad reputation. In the article “Art Attack” one of the key points made is that not everyone is a fan of street art and graffiti. There are people out there who associate street art and graffiti with bad things, and Banksy himself has had problems with the authorities: “He [Banksy] was starting to retreat into anonymity, evading the authorities was one explanation –.