IndexHypothesis and introductionResearch method and research instrumentResearch questionsRecipientsThere are six steps for data collectionEthical considerations and limitationsConclusionHypothesis and introductionDivorce is the end of cohabitation, annulment and the restructuring of the judicial duties and responsibilities of marriage, thus destroying the marital unions that connect a married couple under the rule of law of the country and the distinct state. If a family separation occurs, the initial impact of the divorce will directly affect the child. The social science perspective of psychology applies to this study as it focuses on how people feel and behave, for growth. Psychologists B.F. Skinner and Albert Bandura highlight how rewards, punishments, stress, nutrition, attachment, and parenting motivate a child's education and inclinations. To identify evidence that divorce affects children, a survey will be conducted to determine what the views and opinions are on this topic. According to a study published on October 4, 2010, reported by CBS News, four out of ten traditional marriages in Canada end in divorce (CBC News, 2010). Related studies have explicitly examined mother-adolescent, father-adolescent, and youth relationships. Research has confirmed that divorce can affect adolescent relationships, but it's not actually the divorce but the effects of the divorce. These may include less time with parents, financial hardship, or moving to a different region. The study demonstrated that these determinants can influence young people as they are associated with social, academic and personal well-being. Youth bonds can transform in various ways depending on the consistency and trust placed in young people after divorce. Research has also hypothesized that it may not be the separation that reshapes the child, but other factors due to divorce such as lower socioeconomic status, a move, or conflicts between parents are some examples. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Research Method and Research Tool The survey and research method was based on qualitative data. This is the most valid strategy for the study because it seeks to understand a given dilemma or topic from the perspective of the confined population it occupies. Qualitative research is particularly useful for obtaining culturally specific information about the values, opinions, behaviors, and social contexts of particular communities. It produces data regarding the "human" vision of a problem, i.e. the often contradictory responses, beliefs, opinions, emotions and relationships of individuals. Qualitative methods are also useful for identifying intangible factors, such as social norms, socioeconomic status, gender roles, ethnicity, and religion, whose purpose in the research question may not be immediately apparent. When used in conjunction with quantitative methods, qualitative research can help you better interpret and understand the complex reality of a given circumstance and the associations of quantitative data. The data were analyzed through statistical observations and logical inferences. The research design chosen to investigate the hypothesis based on qualitative data involves the use of participant observation and the results of in-depth interviews. The reason why this research method was chosen is due to its obvious advantages in this area. The types of data produced by this method are field notes, audio or video recordings, and transcriptions. The advantages of this method forregarding the topic of divorce are that the results will be essential and culturally important to the participant, unexpected by the researcher, and essentially intense and descriptive. Research Questions What impact does family divorce have on the mother and adolescent relationship? What effect does family separation have on the relationship between father and teenager? What is the initial impact on teenage relationships? Target Audience The target audience consists of males and females over the age of ten. These ranges were chosen because, according to research by Rhonda Freeman, director of Families in Transition, a program of the Family Services Association of Toronto. It states that children under the age of ten, with their limited cognitive abilities, may develop misconceptions about the causes and effects of divorce (Hoffman, 2018). Although most children under the age of six are victims of divorce, older children have more excellent knowledge and understanding of the effects of the situation and their emotions. Therefore, it makes sense to retrieve information from respondents aged ten years or older. The size of the chosen sample group would be approximately 100 people; this is because in this process it will be much more manageable to measure the results. There are six steps to collect data. Recognize problems for data collection and generate models. Select topics of interest for research and develop surveys to measure. Plan a approach and a method and determine the manipulation of variables. The questions need to be answered for step three. Who will be the target audience? Why is this specific target chosen? From what locations will the data be collected? How should data be collected? Will it be qualitative data or quantitative data? What data sources should be used to obtain the information? Will it be pre-existing or official data? Data can also be collected through surveys, interviews and focus group discussions. How long will the data be collected? Step 4: Collect empirical data. Once all questions from step three have been answered and analyzed and the survey method used has been determined, empirical data can be collected. Step 5: Analyze and evaluate the data. After receiving the results and data information, you can proceed to analyze and interpret the results. Step 6: Act on the result. Although eradicating experimenter bias is difficult, researchers still need to be cautious to minimize experimenter bias. Building valid, reliable and ethical research projects can achieve this goal. There are a few approaches to avoiding experimenter bias in qualitative research. First, interview wording: Interview bias can be ambiguous or obvious in the wording of a question. Problems that are difficult to understand can lead to bewilderment for the individual. To eliminate injustice, it is crucial to remain impartial in all aspects, regardless of the severity of the issue. Additionally, it is helpful if the researcher supervises secondary research to ensure they have a full understanding of the investigation they are conducting. Second, format and nature of the question. This bias includes the selection of different question designs and survey design options and responses administered to the respondent. To avoid this bias, it is essential that the researcher can understand the advantages and disadvantages of each question he will conduct. This way the questions will contain the data with maximum efficiency. Third, the interview mode. This bias occurs when theresearcher designs an efficiently organized interview. For example, the discussion may contain more than ten questions, which can alienate interviewees. Ethical Considerations and Limitations To analyze the effects of marital separation on children, three different research methods have been commonly used: clinical assessments; estimates of children of divorced and intact families; and in-depth interviews with divorced families. Clinical evaluations generally involve examining children of divorcees who have been referred to various counseling or clinical programs. For example, considering the effect of parental divorce by interviewing parents and children in relation to divorce counseling. Although clinical evaluations provide a wealth of data involving children from maritally disrupted families, they focus on advanced cases and, therefore, conclusions cannot be generalized to the majority of children who have experienced marital breakdown. Furthermore, they present an almost perpetually negative picture of children's adjustment after divorce, and it was these studies that prevailed in the early years of research. Comparative investigations usually compare nonclinical samples of children from families who have experienced marital breakdown with children from intact families. These studies typically examine objective, quantifiable outcomes, such as academic performance, emotional adjustment, and self-esteem, through the use of tests. The third technique involves conducting in-depth interviews with parents and children from divorced families to bring out the experiences from their point of view. Problems associated with this method include possible bias or falsification of facts by respondents. In addition to various research techniques, both cross-sectional and longitudinal research were also conducted. Cross-sectioning involves examining individuals at a specific point in time, for example examining children of divorcees soon after separation to see whether they differ from intact families. Longitudinal studies, on the other hand, track a unit of people from a specific point in time with subsequent conferences on numerous occasions after the divorce. Although longitudinal studies are adequately capable of identifying the causes and effects of marital breakdown on children and can involve retrospective data, they are considerably expensive and time-consuming and are consequently conducted less frequently. Although the study of the effects of divorce on children is widespread, many of the findings are uncertain or contradictory. One possible reason for these inconsistencies is that different procedures were practiced in the studies. For example, as stated previously, individuals may base their findings on a case report of children referred for divorce counseling from a local Community Mental Health Center. Because these children may not represent all children of divorce, findings regarding obstacles faced by children of divorce may not be generalizable to the broader population of children. In addition to procedural variations, the definition of “family structure” can lead to different results. Numerous studies examine single-parent families, which can be due to divorce, death, and a parent never marrying. Since it is now relatively well established that children of divorcees differ from children of other single-parent families, it is necessary to avoid grouping divorced, widowed and unmarried parents together. Furthermore, it is imperative to distinguish between single-parent families and those in which the parent has remarried. Studies also vary in the degree to which they measure potentially mediating factors, such as families' socioeconomic status, race, or.