Topic > Article by Antonia Peacocke on the history of the show Family Guy

Antonia Peacocke, a student at Harvard University at the time, writes about the history of the Family Guy television show in her article, Family Guy and Freud: Pranks and Their Relationship to the Unconscious. He also explains how its contents should not be taken very seriously. Peacocke explains the topic in depth, giving the reader his, and others', perspective on the show and its offensive production. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Peacocke informs the reader well about the show, Family Guy, and its “unique” form of entertainment. He also focuses more on the history of the show rather than going forward with his opinion on the program. “…. it has to be one of the few television shows in history that was canceled not just once, but twice” (300). Peacocke uses the program's past information in chronological order, giving the reader the option to let them decide how they want to see the show before allowing themselves to go any further with their opinion. The author includes quotes from the show, but not all of them are as vulgar as they should be. Peacocke gives the reader a broader view of the program rather than simple vulgarity: “Indeed, Family Guy does not aim to hurt, and its creators take some measures to keep it from hitting too hard” (Peacocke 307). Instead of simply telling the reader that some viewers are too squeamish too, he admits that the show is vulgar, other times a little more excessive. Peacocke provides the other side of the argument here and there, letting the reader know what points are being made against the program. This is a great way to present other people's opinions as well as your own. Although the newspaper agrees with him, Peacocke uses excellent facts, even from the show's creator himself, to support his argument. However, Peacocke also uses some episodes that go against his opinion of the show, to once again demonstrate that there are times when the program is very offensive to a certain audience. Peacocke says: “sometimes creators seem to cross paths…. the line of indecency” (308). He covers every part of the TV show, good and bad, and not just based on his word. Peacocke uses not only his own experiences of the show but also those of other fans and their awards. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay In closing, Peacocke uses all fact and example to use well. Most of the article is fact-based to support its argument and helps to allow the reader to choose their own view of the program. It gives a clear idea of ​​the show and how others see it, but also its other important parts, not just focusing on one particular area.