IndexIntroductionRelated ResearchConclusion IntroductionI will certainly never be able to put myself in the situation that people growing up in less developed countries find themselves in. I get a sense of it by being out there, meeting people and talking to them. - Bill Gates Bill Gates is one of the richest people in the world. The amount of wealth and generosity allowed him and his wife (Melinda Gates) to create a foundation focused on the poorest people in the developing world. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The foundation's mission states: "Our Global Development Division works to help lift the world's poorest people out of hunger and poverty. Our Global Health Division aims to harness advances in science and technology to save lives in developing countries.” The driving force behind the Gates Foundation and its mission is the language used in describing the geographic areas and issues on which the foundation focuses. accompanied by words like poverty and lack of science and technology perhaps assumes a skills deficit. But is this the definition that Gates maintains when he uses the term development, or is it used as a platform to encourage new ways of advancing quality in capacity development? Related research In the development approach the term developed is the opposite of developed; and this is determined through a standard of economic measurement called Gross Domestic Product (GDP). GDP is a world development indicator used to measure the income of each nation, therefore countries with the highest GDP are considered developed while countries with a lower income are considered developing. Since the language of developed and developing originates from the economic language of measurement, it also creates hierarchies, thus becoming the description of the nature of nations. Jacques Derrida identifies language as a supplement that presupposes the lack of something and also influences notions of representation, reappropriation and the possibility of perversion. Perhaps, the use of development as a permanent title for non-European nations is the struggle to maintain Western Europe's industrial and materialist model of development or the continuation of a civilizational movement after the states' independence from colonial rule. is that it is a symbolic language that creates categorizations. It strengthens people to confirm a particular perception of thinking, reasoning and interpretation. Thus becoming a single idea to which all parties in "developing" countries must adhere. This subsequently creates a society subjected to a specific form of representation and reappropriation, which is often complemented by the “moving image of language or agency through the hands of others” (147). The purpose of this article is to understand how the economic language of development and development has and is still attempting to create a globalized world with similar principled values. Furthermore, when language reinforces a dominant perception that makes developing outsiders who need to be renewed and developed into insiders who have all the experience and knowledge for economic renewal, how much of this perception is a supplement to the historical narrative of colonialism and its obsession with civilization. When scientists "prove" a theory, it automatically becomes a fact or legal language. Demonstration of a theory does not make a concept or research a fact, but people develop "self-evident" principles and procedures that convinceothers to believe and internalize the hypotheses as fact. Furthermore, the title of scientist creates a general rule that exclusively allows certain "specialists" or "experts" the authority to prove theory as fact. The same metaphor applies to economic language, giving a meaning to words which then becomes natural and factual. The danger arising from terms such as development or third world is that there are no socially constructed concepts, but institutionally formed and embedded in legal structures. The economic language of development and developed is rooted in the foundations of the International Financial Institute. In collaboration with the International Monetary Fund and the United Nations, the World Bank joined the two entities with the aim of financing long-term projects between two parties: “developed donors and developing countries”. Does this language mean anything to you? Because that's how it is for me! The term development presupposes a deficiency and paints a picture of helplessness; it is also quite similar to the savage civilization narrative applied during colonialism. It is unfair and illegitimate. It is not democratic because it talks about the experiences of individuals. For example, in my first political science class when I started college, the teacher asked the students why they were interested in the course; three students responded by saying, “they want to go and help people in developing countries.” The danger is not language itself, but the imaginary images it constructs in our thinking. The economic language of developed and developing countries creates platforms that put nations and their peoples in place of hierarchies and has influenced the creation of universal principles. Universal principles have been used as tools to regulate and promote order on a global scale. But who formulates universal principles; how decisions are made; universal principles are truly universal, for its part does the categorization of nations produced by these principles reveal a new model of neocolonialism created to indirectly control former “colonies”? The power of language can be unjust or just. It all depends on the approach used to justify the intent. Does the intent support the pluralism of common interest or is it a claim of values? Since the term developed presupposes a higher standard and development presupposes ongoing, the words also communicate a dominant paradigm – a dominant paradigm that facilitates only Western values ​​in international politics and regulations. This is not to say that Western values ​​are illegitimate, but it is to highlight the value of voices from all parties in politics and decision-making. Or as Iris Marion Young would say, legitimate democracy is one that facilitates inclusion without assimilation and acceptance of the differences and practices of other communities. For the deliberate intent of economic language is to exclude, adding new normative forms of inclusion that make the unfamiliar familiar. Since global democracy is difficult to achieve due to the lack of common interests among nations, recognizing the value of the knowledge that the outsider has is vital because it brings visibility. Lack of inclusion in decision making places developing nations on a lower scale and becomes the party that has no part but has to follow the rule of those who matter. Furthermore, people in developing countries become objects that need to be studied through research in exchange for charitable goods and services such as microfinance (Anis Chowdhury, 2009). Since the research conducted offers a valuable perspective for understanding social, political and economic challenges, it provides knowledge to the outsidernot inside (Young, 2000). Furthermore, the international development approach does not facilitate neutral terms, but instead reconstructs the context approach aimed at making the unfamiliar familiar. The process of making the unfamiliar familiar is a fixation of what is missing and how it can be improved according to the universal standard. So, assuming that the international standard is that of Western European nations. Treaties often uphold the universal standard which gives developing countries no opportunity to negotiate the agreement. For example, the Treaty of Westphalia of 1684 was created to extend international law to international law in non-European international society with the assumption that non-European nations lacked sovereignty. Viewed in this way, colonization was an unfortunate – but perhaps necessary – historical episode whose effects were largely reversed by the role that international law played, particularly through the United Nations system, in promoting decolonization through mechanisms both institutional and doctrinal". – Anthony Anghie. As historically undertaken, international laws are influencing the continuation of dominant thought patterns and creating a divide between developing and developed nations. The idea of ​​viewing different bodies as developing and developed formulates systems of power. This language places people in the positions of “us” and “them” and fails to begin with an outsider in maintaining focus on the outsider's perspective (Houle, 2009). The concept of international development as manifested in international law can be both inclusive and exclusive. It must conform to a specific ideology of the political and economic agenda. Even through politics it happens to deal with the intentions of international relations; Economics plays a significant role in promoting globalization according to universal principles. has played a certain role in defining development agendas directly and indirectly: the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. These institutions were established to promote stable exchange rates, foster the growth of world trade and facilitate the international movement of capital.” _Shirin RaiAs Rai illustrates the principles of development and its categories are artificial but include a certain way of thinking; the principles are based on commerce, the aim is to control and include the language of power. In Inclusion and Democracy, Iris Young highlights the importance of legitimacy. Legitimacy is a decision-making process; the concept of not using politics for competitive purposes but of creating an inclusive space for democratic processes. Since democracy discourse is often used primarily in the national-state context, it should also be included in universal regulations and orders. Additionally, Young is interested in supporting and embracing difference; therefore, the voice of people in developing countries should be privileged and given access to dialogue. The inequality that exists in the language of international development is a continuation of colonial history. Colonial history shows the colonial powers as external and the colonies as internal. In this 21st century, this internal and external dynamic has translated into growth and development. By allowing developed countries to monitor and regulate the institutional functionality of developing countries, international law neglects the valuable perspective that outsiders have to offer. Considering universal principles, the insider and outsider dynamic becomes complex; and this is because the law used in developing countries is subject to the standard of international law. For example, countriesin sub-Saharan Africa they are the outsiders because the laws are unfamiliar, while for developed countries like the United States they are the insiders because the law applies to their cultural values ​​and historical context. But what are the implications of being an outsider in your own nation state? How does it affect the functionality and enforcement of laws if they are not familiar with the foreign state? Stranger is a term used to describe a person who lives in a country that is not his own (Merriam-Webster Dictionary). In the book Democracy and Foreigners, Bonnie Honig explains the situation of foreigners beyond national borders. For Honig, being foreign is not just the idea of ​​being a non-citizen, but can also be the state of being a foreigner in one's own country. "The foreigner operates in each case both as a support and as a threat to the regime in question" (7). In a context of universal principle, people in developing countries are not only strangers to the regulations and treaties signed to govern their nations, but they are also strangers to their own knowledge. People in developing countries have conformed to European civilization and modernity, which has prevented them from seeing their own cultural, political and economic civilization. Because development consideration requires a large-scale industrial mechanical approach, developing nations are forced to abandon collective substantive agriculture to cash crop agriculture (Escobar, 1995). The struggle for development is exclusive and automatically strives for a symbolic universe that follows only one form of thought. The act of giving order indicates a level of authority and a hieratic structure that formulates ways of exclusion (Young, 2000). It is a conceptual framework built with the aim of purifying the global standard. It is exclusive, creates oppositions, forms otherness and makes the insider the outsider with less unification and economic, social or political understanding. Most modes of exclusion are influenced by the notion of self-interest and history. It can also be the language of civilization and ferocity. In most cases, language influences how individuals construct perceptions. Being perceived as civilized can automatically give you the power to discriminate and dehumanize the other. By perceiving the civilized as knowing and the savage as backward, we are creating a hieratic language that can be internalized into our thinking, thus creating divisionism of thought that can subsequently be transferred to our actions. In the section Spontaneity: Its Strengths and Weaknesses, Frantz Fanon highlights the themes of the legacy of colonialism, class division, globalization, the influence of commerce in politics, and the complexities of civilization versus tradition. And although these topics can be viewed differently, Fanon demonstrates how they are interconnected and depend on each other in their statement and application. It also highlights the hypocrisy of the method of indirect colonialism that reappears in current international organizations such as the World Trade Organization and the International Monetary Fund. The formation and implementation of structural adjustment and capitulation programs in developing countries aimed to improve international relations between the former colonies and the colonizer. the one focused on maintaining the standard of globalized liberal civilization (Fidler, 2000). The programs also aimed at reducing poverty in southern countries. Conclusion The persistence in using developing countries as an object of special attention from humanity legitimizes the presence of NGOs. Furthermore, NGO ethics are typically structured using.