The essay on Immanuel Kant's moral theory focuses on the concept of the categorical imperative, which states that moral actions must be performed for the sake of duty and not for personal gain. Here we will analyze a story of moral dilemma through the perspective of Kant's concept. We say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay You traveled on the ship for about two days when the accident occurred. Everyone abandon ship due to the severity of the damage. A boat is also damaged and water comes in through the hole trying to fill the boat. When there are ten of you on the boat, the boat can stay afloat as long as nine people scoop up the water with their hands while the other person rests for 10 minutes before replacing one person who will also take turns to rest before returning on board. work too. By doing this until 5 hours have passed, you will prevent the boat from sinking until the rescue operation begins. You will rest for 10 minutes when you realize that there is a healthy boat nearby with 9 people on board and one of them is your best friend. He calls you to join them so that you don't have to struggle to get the water out. If you leave the rest of the people in the damaged board behind, they will only sustain their efforts for a maximum of two hours, which in turn will minimize their chances of survival before the rescue team arrives and which in turn puts in your safety. This raises the question: what will you do in this moral dilemma situation? Kant states that the supreme principle of morality is an ideal of rationality which he called the "categorical imperative" (CI). Kant branded the IC as an impartial, rationally essential and absolute principle, so there is no possibility of not following the IC even if there are natural desires that act contrary to it. He characterizes it as All explicit moral necessities, as far as Kant is concerned, are acceptable according to this principle, meaning that all immoral actions are illogical because they go against the IC. Other theorists, such as Hobbes, Locke, and Aquinas, had also argued that moral desires are centered on standards of rationality. However, these ideals were useful principles of reasonableness for gratifying one's needs or external rational principles detectable by reason, as in Locke and Aquinas. Kant found that the analysis of practical reason shows the necessity for rational agents to conform to instrumental principles. However he also argued that conformity to the IC (a non-instrumental principle), and thus to the moral requirements themselves, can nevertheless be shown to be essential for rational action. This argument was based on his striking doctrine that a rational will must be considered autonomous, or free, in the sense of being the author of the law that binds it. The IC is mainly based on the law of autonomous will. Therefore, what primarily supports Kant's moral philosophy is the idea of ​​reason, which is practically demonstrated by the fact that man should not be tied to “slavery”, but be guided by passion. Furthermore, the existence of this reason led Kant to discover that people are all equal and everyone deserves respect. He also argues that there are no consequences that have fundamental moral value because good will is the only good thing. Good will does its moral duty through free choice dictated primarily by reason. So good will is a person's free will that is purely a consequence of reason. Formulations of Kant's moral principle: The formula of the law of nature. states that the.