One of the most trending topics when voting for a presidential candidate or state representative is healthcare. Everyone wants to know the candidates' plans to keep the average American healthy and worry-free when it comes to their medical plans. People are turning to healthcare as a means to function as normally as possible. So why is healthcare important? This essay states that healthcare is important because it can help fix something that is essentially “broken” in you, be it physical, emotional, mental, internal, or external. People turn to healthcare as a means of supporting themselves when times are difficult, especially when they are poor or close to poverty. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay When it comes to healthcare, there are several theories of justice that may agree or disagree with the argument for free Medicare for all. The differences between libertarian, utilitarian, and egalitarian theories arise from their view of what is right. When we refer to what is right we go back to what Lewis Vaughn said in chapter 1: “Justice in the most general sense refers to people getting what is right or what is their due.” When we talk about health care we are addressing a different kind of justice called distributive justice which according to Vaughn is "justice concerning the fair distribution of society's advantages and disadvantages, or benefits and burdens, including income, poverty, employment, rights, taxes and public service". .”There are two main theories of justice that view the healthcare dilemma on opposite sides of the spectrum. I will first talk about libertarian theories of justice, which in summary state that the burdens of a society should consist in the role of a government "that protects the rights of individuals to freely pursue their interests in the economic market without violations of their rights". freedom through coercion, manipulation or fraud." This means that libertarians do not favor the idea of ​​free healthcare because it would take away some of their freedom, these people prefer freedom in general. They believe that the government has no obligation to “adjust the distribution of benefits and burdens among people.” According to Vaughn, these people believe that the distribution of health care should be the responsibility of “free and autonomous individuals.” With this in mind, Vaughn shares that “no one has the right to healthcare and a government program that uses taxpayer dollars to provide universal healthcare.” or even healthcare reserved only for low-income families would be unfair.” From a liberal point of view, programs such as health care for all would be considered a “violation” of people's right to use their resources as they see fit. They believe that if the government provided free healthcare to all New Yorkers or Americans, it would be acting unfairly. I disagree with this theory and lean more towards egalitarian theories of justice. Norman Daniel mentions how libertarians might see this as a “bottomless pit” and that's because they see it as an ever-expanding scope of medical needs. This means that protecting such a costly right to healthcare would ensure that their rights to liberty and property are not violated. Egalitarian theories of justice mention that important benefits and burdens of society?