Topic > John Stuart Mills' views on studying the effects of negative parenting on a 5 year old and associated abuse: physical, emotional and verbal

Bringing a child into the world is a choice that many people choose to make, because parenting can bring out many characteristics that they didn't know they had. While many parenting characteristics are positive, there are possibilities for negative aspects. The specific case I would like to highlight was that of a 5-year-old boy who was being physically, emotionally and verbally abused by his father. Our 5 year old was playing indoors when he accidentally kicked the ball into the living room TV, outraged his father threw the ball and continuously beat his son with a belt telling him that he is ungrateful and will never be able to do it. forgive him. These attacks have been repeated for two years and continue to get worse. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay According to Immanuel Kant, we cannot predict consequences even if we predict outcomes. In this case, by continually abusing his son, the father causes his son to resent not only him, but also himself. He is teaching his son that in life if one does something wrong to punish him it is necessary to hurt him emotionally, he did it by bursting the ball. As the abuse continues, this child may suffer more emotionally and end up developing acceptance issues as he or she gets older. Seeing his father as a bully, he may turn his abuse into a flaw by allowing himself to be bullied, or use it negatively, or become the bully himself. The worst part is, when his son has children, there's a chance that his father's actions could become his parenting style as well. On the other hand John, Stuart Mill would applaud his father for his excellent parenting choice. According to Mill we can foresee the consequences, as long as the majority benefits and it is right to proceed. In defense, the father who spanks his son will teach him that what he was doing was wrong and that it was not okay. By disciplining the child to the point of mental breakdown, he will make him listen to his father in the future. Mill would agree that the father was not at all wrong in how he chose to teach his son a lesson. The father continues to gain control of his son and keep him disciplined like a well-behaved child. When his father told him that he would never forgive him, his son realized how important it was to behave well to regain his father's approval. Ultimately what the child did was wrong and he deserved what he received as punishment. “Our actions give us a reputation, we can choose what we want to be,” Aristotle once stated. As soon as the boy's teachers begin to catch on, the father will be known as a child molester. His mother might create hatred for his father and ask for sole custody. As soon as the father builds the title of child molester, anyone who crosses paths with his child may take out their frustration on him. As his son continues to grow into a young man, his respect and love for his father will slowly disappear and his father will become just another faint memory. When the father chose to continually beat his son for small mistakes, he accepted whatever consequences would come in the future. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get Custom Essay In conclusion , Mill was wrong in many cases because, although the father.