Students entering college for the first time look forward to the numerous tests they are required to take least of all. For many, test taking and college go hand in hand, but some argue that the use of tests as a grading system should be discontinued in colleges. In theory it sounds like a great idea. It would reduce stress and, most likely, class time as well. However, the discontinuation of testing as a form of assessment in universities would soon be regretted. Assessment systems are an essential part of any education. Testing ensures that the student is learning what the teaching teaches and identifies areas that may need improvement. The results of assessment systems also show future employers or schools an idea of ​​the type of worker a student will be. The numerous lists of positive effects not only on students but on teachers, and even on the university as a whole, outweigh the disadvantages of using tests as an evaluation system. One reason why assessment systems should be required is to ensure that each student has retained the information being taught. Diane Ravitch agrees with this statement in her essay “In Defense of Testing.” Ravitch says, “[Testing] protects us…from inept drivers, dangerous products, and shoddy professionals.” (139). Ravitch is saying that testing as a form of evaluation helps ensure that each person is well-informed in the field they are in and gives people a sense of security when they have to put their trust in such professionals. There are many core courses required for each major depending on the university you attend. It is essential that the information obtained during these courses is retained in case the need arises in a future career. If the grading system is taken… halfway through the paper… or they would focus solely on what they are aware they have misunderstood. This saves valuable time for both the teacher and the student. It also helps employers save money by only hiring those they know have a history of good work ethic. The arguments against rating systems are abundant despite the obvious flaws. Testing as an evaluation system in universities should be maintained because, although the opposing point of view brings to light many valid points, discontinuing the current evaluation system would cause more problems than it would solve. Works Cited Goodman, Paul. “A proposal to abolish testing.” Forming a Critical Perspective, Ed, Ann Spurlock. 1st. Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010. 191-193. Print.Ravitch, Diane “In Defense of Testing.” Forming a Critical Perspective, Ed, Ann Spurlock. 1st. Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010. 194-195. Press.