However, the second theory which states: "Social and economic inequalities must be arranged so that they both benefit the least advantaged", allows for inequalities of treatment to certain conditions. Freedoms can be limited as long as the restrictions are to the benefit of all. In contradiction to this theory, Natural Law Ethics supports the idea that the rightness of actions can be determined by nature itself, rather than by the laws, customs or principles of society and individuals. This theory provides strong implications for end-of-life issues. This theory suggests using ordinary means to find a cure or be healed, but it is not necessary to use extraordinary means. For me, I believe that every life has a purpose and that is to help others as much as possible, and if you have the ability to save a life by taking extraordinary measures, you should do so, which is one of the main reasons why I don't conform to Natural law of ethics. Regarding virtue ethics, feminist ethics and care ethics, although I agree with many of their core theories, for example care ethics suggests acting in accordance with care values , be compassionate, understanding, kind and helpful. However, this theory, along with the other two, does not provide an obvious way to resolve moral conflicts. As for the principles underlying virtue ethics, it is based on the idea that a person is predisposed to