The language of this cognitive statement allows multiple interpretations. Therefore, we will assume that the past refers to both the distant and recent past, and that the phrase “changing the future” includes the AoK's further development of human science's ability to predict ways to change the future. To test the validity of the knowledge claim, we will examine both the history of AoK and the humanities of AoK in relation to the past and future respectively. The story uses a lot of WoK, random connections and perspectives. Historians record the most important parts of the past in order to cover the event as accurately as possible, which is very difficult. They are required to observe, understand and make connections between multiple events and then select and omit certain information because not everything can be included. Therefore, historians rely on various WoK such as memory, emotion, imagination, and language. When the event is recent and there are witnesses available, memory is used. Regarding emotions, a historian must be able to visualize the message and meaning of past events to a level that makes us sympathize with or learn from these past events. This brings us to the next important WoK which is about communication. Most primary sources of historical events come from books, diaries, articles, and other forms of literature that rely heavily on language. Because the language also contains many PoKs, some of these sources are unreliable, which limits the pool of knowledge about events from which historians can draw. In these situations, where there are too few documents or where gaps appear, a professional historian can use imagination, another WoK, to fill in the gaps with what most likely happened. After gathering all the information… middle of the paper… preventing personal cultural bias Considering the counterarguments and similarities between the AoKs, it is reasonable to say that both AoKs need to work together to understand the past and future actions. Their similarities make them Aok compatible, and the differences also act as strengths because a PoK in one AoK can be balanced by the other Aok. For example, history cannot look back on past events to know, for example, the exact date of a disaster. But through geography and analysis of the information collected, it is possible to discover important dates. After analyzing the statement, it is possible to conclude that there is some truth in the title but its implication that the two must be in contrast is false because the human scientist and the historian can both individually understand the past and change the future and they can have an even greater influence by working together.